Chase Cambria
  • Log in
  • Not a member yet?
go
  • Contact
  • Webmail
  • Archive
 
  • Home
  • Overview
  • Journal Issues
  • Special Issues
  • Subscriptions
  • Editorial Board
  • Author Guidelines

International Corporate Rescue

Journal Issues

  • Vol 1 (2004)
  • Vol 2 (2005)
  • Vol 3 (2006)
  • Vol 4 (2007)
  • Vol 5 (2008)
  • Vol 6 (2009)
  • Vol 7 (2010)
  • Vol 8 (2011)
  • Vol 9 (2012)
  • Vol 10 (2013)
  • Vol 11 (2014)
  • Vol 12 (2015)
  • Vol 13 (2016)
  • Vol 14 (2017)
  • Vol 15 (2018)
  • Vol 16 (2019)
  • Vol 17 (2020)
  • Vol 18 (2021)
  • Vol 19 (2022)
  • Vol 20 (2023)
  • Vol 21 (2024)
  • Vol 22 (2025)
  • Vol 23 (2026)
  •         Issue 1
  •         Issue 2
  •         Issue 3
  •         Issue 4
  •         Issue 5

Vol 23 (2026) - Issue 5

Article preview

Silent Leverage: Mediation Driving Efficiency in Avoidance Transaction Litigation

Tanishq Bhonsle, IX Semester Student, Maharashtra National Law University, Nagpur, India

Synopsis
Avoidance transactions under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (IBC) are designed to safeguard the corporate debtor’s estate by reversing preferential, undervalued, extortionate and fraudulent transfers. These provisions help in preserving creditor equality through enforcing the parri passu distribution rule, preventing value erosion, and ensuring that the insolvency process is not distorted by opportunistic or abusive pre-insolvency conduct. However, despite their importance, the effectiveness of avoidance proceedings has been reduced significantly by prolonged litigation due to heavy evidentiary burden and prolonged delays involved in such proceedings. This results in delayed or diluted recoveries for creditors and thus nullify the objective of value maximisation. In this backdrop, the proposal of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India’s Expert Committee Report on Mediation (January 2024) have reignited the debate around whether alternative dispute resolution mechanisms can be applied into the insolvency framework. This article examines the challenges that currently afflict in adjudication of avoidance applications and evaluates the feasibility of introducing mediation, as the same was rejected by the expert committee by invoking the defence of violation of public interest. The article explores the feasibility of introducing mediation specifically in cases of preferential and undervalued transactions, where liability is determined by objective statutory conditions rather than element of mala fides or fraud. Drawing upon the practices from different jurisdiction and developments under Indian law, the article argues that a court-supervised mediation mechanism for these applications can complement adjudication without diluting the public interest dimensions of the IBC. If cautiously designed, such a framework has the ability to expedite value recovery, enhance bid certainty and ease the burden on insolvency tribunals. Ultimately, the article contends that application of mediation to preferential and undervalued transaction can help better align these provisions with the objectives of IBC i.e. speed and value maximisation.

Buy this article
Get instant access to this article for only EUR 55 / USD 60 / GBP 45
Buy this issue
Get instant access to this issue for only EUR 175 / USD 230 / GBP 155
Buy annual subscription
Subscribe to the journal and recieve a hardcopy for
EUR 730 / USD 890 / GBP 560
If you are already a subscriber
log In here

International Corporate Rescue

"International Corporate Rescue is a must-have of the most current substantive law developments in restructuring and insolvency law. Covering legislative overviews and novelties, case reviews and analyses of cross-border controversies, it is a concise, accessible and insightful collection of leading articles from respected lawyers and academics from all over the world."

Prof. Em. Bob Wessels, University of Leiden, Leiden

 

 

Copyright 2006 Chase Cambria Company (Publishing) Limited. All rights reserved.