International Corporate Rescue
Journal Issues
- Vol 1 (2004)
- Vol 2 (2005)
- Vol 3 (2006)
- Vol 4 (2007)
- Vol 5 (2008)
- Vol 6 (2009)
- Vol 7 (2010)
- Vol 8 (2011)
- Vol 9 (2012)
- Vol 10 (2013)
- Vol 11 (2014)
- Vol 12 (2015)
- Vol 13 (2016)
- Vol 14 (2017)
- Vol 15 (2018)
- Vol 16 (2019)
- Vol 17 (2020)
- Vol 18 (2021)
- Vol 19 (2022)
- Issue 1
- Issue 2
- Issue 3
- Issue 4
- Issue 5
- Issue 6
- Vol 20 (2023)
- Vol 21 (2024)
- Vol 22 (2025)
Vol 19 (2022) - Issue 2
Article preview
Developing Robust Relevant Alternative Analysis
Alexis Anaman, Senior Managing Director, Lisa Rickelton, Senior Managing Director, and Jonathan Dyer, Senior Director, FTI Consulting, London, UKSynopsis
The judgments in Restructuring Plans to date (particularly Hurricane Energy and Virgin Active) have emphasised the importance of the Relevant Alternative analysis for Restructuring Plans. The cross-class cram down function of Restructuring Plans, together with the possibility to apply to exclude a class from voting where the court is satisfied that none of the members of the class has a genuine economic interest means that robust Relevant Alternative analysis is fundamental to a successful plan.
In this context, we set out the key issues to consider when formulating Relevant Alternative analysis and selected learning points from recent judgments.
Get instant access to this article for only EUR 55 / USD 60 / GBP 45
Get instant access to this issue for only EUR 175 / USD 230 / GBP 155
Subscribe to the journal and recieve a hardcopy for
EUR 730 / USD 890 / GBP 560
log In here
Copyright 2006 Chase Cambria Company (Publishing) Limited. All rights reserved.
