Chase Cambria
  • Log in
  • Not a member yet?
go
  • Contact
  • Webmail
  • Archive
 
  • Home
  • Overview
  • Journal Issues
  • Subscriptions
  • Editorial Board
  • Author Guidelines

International Corporate Rescue

Journal Issues

  • Vol 1 (2004)
  • Vol 2 (2005)
  • Vol 3 (2006)
  • Vol 4 (2007)
  • Vol 5 (2008)
  • Vol 6 (2009)
  • Vol 7 (2010)
  • Vol 8 (2011)
  • Vol 9 (2012)
  • Vol 10 (2013)
  • Vol 11 (2014)
  • Vol 12 (2015)
  • Vol 13 (2016)
  • Vol 14 (2017)
  • Vol 15 (2018)
  • Vol 16 (2019)
  •         Issue 1
  •         Issue 2
  •         Issue 3
  •         Issue 4
  •         Issue 5
  •         Issue 6
  • Vol 17 (2020)
  • Vol 18 (2021)
  • Vol 19 (2022)
  • Vol 20 (2023)
  • Vol 21 (2024)
  • Vol 22 (2025)

Vol 16 (2019) - Issue 6

Article preview

Chapter 15 Court Clarifies Procedures for Seeking to Vacate Recognition: In re Foreign Economic Industrial Bank Ltd. and In re Larisa Markus, 2019 WL 4943752 (Bankr. SDNY)

Scott C. Shelley, Counsel, Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan LLP, New York, USA

Synopsis

The US Bankruptcy Court of the Southern District of New York (the 'Bankruptcy Court') recently denied motions to vacate the chapter 15 recognition of two related cases involving foreign main proceedings in Russia, and in so doing, clarified the proper procedures and rules applicable to requests to vacate recognition. The Bankruptcy Court explained that although Rule 60(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure is generally applicable in US bankruptcy proceedings by virtue of Rule 9024 of the Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure (the 'Bankruptcy Rules'), it does not apply to requests to vacate recognition orders in chapter 15, because section 1517(d) of title 11, United States Code (the 'Bankruptcy Code') sets forth the specific standard for modifying or terminating recognition orders. Under that standard, recognition may be modified or terminated if the grounds for granting recognition are shown to have been lacking, or to no longer exist. Because the movant failed to satisfy the criteria of section 1517(d), the Bankruptcy Court declined to vacate its recognition orders. This ruling stands as a reminder to practitioners that although chapter 15 practice has some similarities with chapter 11, chapter 15 may be governed by special rules that implicate critical procedural distinctions.

Buy this article
Get instant access to this article for only EUR 55 / USD 60 / GBP 45
Buy this issue
Get instant access to this issue for only EUR 175 / USD 230 / GBP 155
Buy annual subscription
Subscribe to the journal and recieve a hardcopy for
EUR 730 / USD 890 / GBP 560
If you are already a subscriber
log In here

International Corporate Rescue

"International Corporate Rescue is the ultimate legal and commercial guide through the maze of complex cross border insolvency and restructuring issues."

William Q Derrough, Managing Director and Co-head of Recapitalization & Restructuring Group, Moelis & Company, New York

 

 

Copyright 2006 Chase Cambria Company (Publishing) Limited. All rights reserved.